Australia vs Kazakhstan: Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities)

Australia
5,641 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
5,257 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
141st
Kazakhstan rank
142nd

Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities) over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k198920062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,641 US dollar per square kilometre against 5,257 US dollar per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 384 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 163 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 2,104 US dollar per square kilometre 450.88 US dollar per square kilometre 1,653 US dollar per square kilometre Australia
2000s 3,861 US dollar per square kilometre 3,569 US dollar per square kilometre 292.05 US dollar per square kilometre Australia
2010s 5,763 US dollar per square kilometre 7,141 US dollar per square kilometre 1,378 US dollar per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 5,075 US dollar per square kilometre 4,290 US dollar per square kilometre 784.21 US dollar per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, other reserve (currency, deposits, securities), Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 5,641 US dollar per square kilometre against 5,257 US dollar per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, other reserve (currency, deposits, securities) between Australia and Kazakhstan?
384 US dollar per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for reserve assets, other reserve (currency, deposits, securities)?
Australia ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities, financial derivatives and other claims) (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-other-reserve-currency-deposits-securities-financial-derivatives-and-other-4/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-other-reserve-currency-deposits-securities-financial-derivatives-and-other-4/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities, financial derivatives and other claims) (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 4,024 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets, Other reserve (currency, deposits, securities, financial derivatives and other claims) (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.