How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?

30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Eswatini: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF

Chile

0.0018 US dollar per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Eswatini

0.0017 US dollar per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

66th

Eswatini rank

67th

Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF over time

Chile
Eswatini

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0018 US dollar per US$ of GDP against 0.0017 US dollar per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 US dollar per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Chile ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 67th of 163 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0043 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0034 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0009 US dollar per US$ of GDP	Chile
2000s	0.0033 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.004 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0007 US dollar per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2010s	0.0016 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0022 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0005 US dollar per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2020s	0.0021 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0019 US dollar per US$ of GDP	0.0002 US dollar per US$ of GDP	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf, Chile or Eswatini?: Chile, at 0.0018 US dollar per US$ of GDP against 0.0017 US dollar per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf between Chile and Eswatini?: 0.0001 US dollar per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf?: Chile ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 67th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-3/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-3/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per unit of GDP
Unit: US dollar per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 163 places, 4,307 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.