What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per capita between Barbados and Republic of Korea?

2.69 units per person, with Barbados ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Republic of Korea?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita

Barbados

61.36 units per person

in 2025

Republic of Korea

58.67 units per person

in 2025

Barbados rank

44th

Republic of Korea rank

45th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita over time

Barbados
Republic of Korea

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 61.36 units per person against 58.67 units per person in Republic of Korea, a difference of 2.69 units per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Barbados ranks 44th and Republic of Korea ranks 45th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Republic of Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Republic of Korea	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per person	0.0736 units per person	0.0736 units per person	Republic of Korea
1970s	12.16 units per person	0.294 units per person	11.86 units per person	Barbados
1980s	11.98 units per person	0.6957 units per person	11.28 units per person	Barbados
1990s	3.74 units per person	9.7 units per person	5.95 units per person	Republic of Korea
2000s	28.46 units per person	10.8 units per person	17.65 units per person	Barbados
2010s	43.64 units per person	39.38 units per person	4.26 units per person	Barbados
2020s	61.21 units per person	63.36 units per person	2.15 units per person	Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per capita, Barbados or Republic of Korea?: Barbados, at 61.36 units per person against 58.67 units per person in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per capita between Barbados and Republic of Korea?: 2.69 units per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Republic of Korea?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Barbados and Republic of Korea rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per capita?: Barbados ranks 44th and Republic of Korea ranks 45th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-capita/barbados/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-capita/barbados/korea-rep/">Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 192 places, 12,362 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.