How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Nepal: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Angola

122.21 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Nepal

149.58 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Angola rank

130th

Nepal rank

127th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Angola
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 149.58 units per square kilometre against 122.21 units per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 27.37 units per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 127th of 189 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	4.37 units per square kilometre	4.37 units per square kilometre	Nepal
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	18.18 units per square kilometre	18.18 units per square kilometre	Nepal
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	47.26 units per square kilometre	47.26 units per square kilometre	Nepal
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	56.5 units per square kilometre	56.5 units per square kilometre	Nepal
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	21.7 units per square kilometre	21.7 units per square kilometre	Nepal
2010s	50.5 units per square kilometre	61.93 units per square kilometre	11.42 units per square kilometre	Nepal
2020s	125.52 units per square kilometre	153.64 units per square kilometre	28.12 units per square kilometre	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Angola or Nepal?: Nepal, at 149.58 units per square kilometre against 122.21 units per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Angola and Nepal?: 27.37 units per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Nepal rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Angola ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 127th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nepal: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/angola/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/angola/nepal/">Angola vs Nepal: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.