Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
155.61 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia
166.26 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
124th
Cambodia rank
121st

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cambodia
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 166.26 units per square kilometre against 155.61 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 10.65 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 124th and Cambodia ranks 121st of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Cambodia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cambodia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 2.99 units per square kilometre 2.99 units per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 3.6 units per square kilometre 3.6 units per square kilometre Cambodia
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0678 units per square kilometre 0.0678 units per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 3.15 units per square kilometre 0.7406 units per square kilometre 2.41 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 16.89 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 16.89 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 161.47 units per square kilometre 68.68 units per square kilometre 92.79 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 159.83 units per square kilometre 170.78 units per square kilometre 10.95 units per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Cambodia?
Cambodia, at 166.26 units per square kilometre against 155.61 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia?
10.65 units per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 124th and Cambodia ranks 121st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cambodia/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.