Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Barbados
39,511 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Korea
33,601 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
10th
Republic of Korea rank
12th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Republic of Korea
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 39,511 units per square kilometre against 33,601 units per square kilometre in Republic of Korea, a difference of 5,910 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Barbados ranks 10th and Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Republic of Korea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 24.7 units per square kilometre 24.7 units per square kilometre Republic of Korea
1970s 7,092 units per square kilometre 105.85 units per square kilometre 6,986 units per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 7,092 units per square kilometre 302.49 units per square kilometre 6,789 units per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 2,273 units per square kilometre 4,498 units per square kilometre 2,225 units per square kilometre Republic of Korea
2000s 17,758 units per square kilometre 5,390 units per square kilometre 12,368 units per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 28,316 units per square kilometre 20,527 units per square kilometre 7,788 units per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 40,584 units per square kilometre 35,310 units per square kilometre 5,274 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Barbados or Republic of Korea?
Barbados, at 39,511 units per square kilometre against 33,601 units per square kilometre in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Barbados and Republic of Korea?
5,910 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Republic of Korea rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 10th and Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/barbados/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/barbados/korea-rep/">Barbados vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.