Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Barbados
39,511 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
34,309 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
10th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
11th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 39,511 units per square kilometre against 34,309 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 5,202 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Barbados ranks 10th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 201.43 units per square kilometre 201.43 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 7,092 units per square kilometre 3,955 units per square kilometre 3,137 units per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 7,092 units per square kilometre 16,235 units per square kilometre 9,143 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 2,273 units per square kilometre 3.33 units per square kilometre 2,270 units per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 17,758 units per square kilometre 15,857 units per square kilometre 1,900 units per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 28,316 units per square kilometre 27,942 units per square kilometre 373.55 units per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 40,584 units per square kilometre 33,598 units per square kilometre 6,986 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Barbados or Trinidad and Tobago?
Barbados, at 39,511 units per square kilometre against 34,309 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
5,202 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 10th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/">Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.