How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Ecuador: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Bhutan

159.93 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador

154.11 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Bhutan rank

122nd

Ecuador rank

125th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Bhutan
Ecuador

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 159.93 units per square kilometre against 154.11 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 5.82 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bhutan ranks 122nd and Ecuador ranks 125th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	1.4 units per square kilometre	1.4 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	20.35 units per square kilometre	20.35 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
1980s	10.71 units per square kilometre	24.76 units per square kilometre	14.05 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
1990s	20.58 units per square kilometre	71.72 units per square kilometre	51.14 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2000s	38.42 units per square kilometre	100.7 units per square kilometre	62.28 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	90.12 units per square kilometre	159.83 units per square kilometre	69.71 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	164.27 units per square kilometre	158.3 units per square kilometre	5.97 units per square kilometre	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Bhutan or Ecuador?: Bhutan, at 159.93 units per square kilometre against 154.11 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Bhutan and Ecuador?: 5.82 units per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Ecuador rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Bhutan ranks 122nd and Ecuador ranks 125th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Ecuador: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/">Bhutan vs Ecuador: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.