Botswana vs Solomon Islands: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Botswana
131.88 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
151 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
129th
Solomon Islands rank
126th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Solomon Islands
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 151 units per square kilometre against 131.88 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 19.12 units per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Botswana ranks 129th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0392 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0392 units per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 1.91 units per square kilometre 2.02 units per square kilometre 0.1104 units per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1980s 26.53 units per square kilometre 18.69 units per square kilometre 7.84 units per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 46.03 units per square kilometre 27.15 units per square kilometre 18.88 units per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 38.5 units per square kilometre 28.59 units per square kilometre 9.91 units per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 76.73 units per square kilometre 80.04 units per square kilometre 3.31 units per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 127.37 units per square kilometre 155.1 units per square kilometre 27.73 units per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Botswana or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 151 units per square kilometre against 131.88 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Botswana and Solomon Islands?
19.12 units per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Solomon Islands rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 129th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Solomon Islands: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/botswana/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/botswana/solomon-islands/">Botswana vs Solomon Islands: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.