Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
1.11 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.14 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
159th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Zimbabwe
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.14 units per square kilometre against 1.11 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.03 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.92 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.92 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 1.11 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 1.11 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.6151 units per square kilometre 0.0818 units per square kilometre 0.5334 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0.2118 units per square kilometre 0.3955 units per square kilometre 0.1837 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3557 units per square kilometre 1.23 units per square kilometre 0.8738 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.8481 units per square kilometre 1.23 units per square kilometre 0.3841 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.14 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre 0.0269 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.14 units per square kilometre against 1.11 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
0.03 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zimbabwe/">Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.