How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Chad

3.46 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

1.14 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

156th

Zimbabwe rank

159th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Chad
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Chad currently reports 3.46 units per square kilometre against 1.14 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.32 units per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 3.0 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Chad ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.4656 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0.4656 units per square kilometre	Chad
1970s	0.3208 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0.3208 units per square kilometre	Chad
1980s	1.63 units per square kilometre	0.0818 units per square kilometre	1.55 units per square kilometre	Chad
1990s	0.3097 units per square kilometre	0.3955 units per square kilometre	0.0858 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.326 units per square kilometre	1.23 units per square kilometre	0.9034 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	3.18 units per square kilometre	1.23 units per square kilometre	1.94 units per square kilometre	Chad
2020s	3.55 units per square kilometre	1.17 units per square kilometre	2.38 units per square kilometre	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Chad or Zimbabwe?: Chad, at 3.46 units per square kilometre against 1.14 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Chad and Zimbabwe?: 2.32 units per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Chad ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chad/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chad/zimbabwe/">Chad vs Zimbabwe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.