How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Samoa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Chile

871.17 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Samoa

889.64 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

83rd

Samoa rank

82nd

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Samoa

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 889.64 units per square kilometre against 871.17 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 18.47 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Chile ranks 83rd and Samoa ranks 82nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	—
1970s	13.3 units per square kilometre	58.54 units per square kilometre	45.24 units per square kilometre	Samoa
1980s	31.55 units per square kilometre	1.87 units per square kilometre	29.68 units per square kilometre	Chile
1990s	185.52 units per square kilometre	270.69 units per square kilometre	85.17 units per square kilometre	Samoa
2000s	402.85 units per square kilometre	356.47 units per square kilometre	46.38 units per square kilometre	Chile
2010s	581.33 units per square kilometre	586.09 units per square kilometre	4.76 units per square kilometre	Samoa
2020s	896.8 units per square kilometre	913.79 units per square kilometre	17 units per square kilometre	Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Chile or Samoa?: Samoa, at 889.64 units per square kilometre against 871.17 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Chile and Samoa?: 18.47 units per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Samoa rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 83rd and Samoa ranks 82nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Samoa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/">Chile vs Samoa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.