How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Israel?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs Israel: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Denmark

30,649 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Israel

32,110 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Denmark rank

14th

Israel rank

13th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Denmark
Israel

How they compare

Israel currently reports 32,110 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 1,461 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 14th and Israel ranks 13th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 6 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Denmark	Israel	Difference	Ahead
1960s	1,129 units per square kilometre	571.58 units per square kilometre	557.87 units per square kilometre	Denmark
1970s	2,037 units per square kilometre	373.14 units per square kilometre	1,664 units per square kilometre	Denmark
1980s	5,020 units per square kilometre	319.32 units per square kilometre	4,700 units per square kilometre	Denmark
1990s	14,487 units per square kilometre	415.64 units per square kilometre	14,071 units per square kilometre	Denmark
2000s	14,506 units per square kilometre	12,034 units per square kilometre	2,472 units per square kilometre	Denmark
2010s	22,715 units per square kilometre	20,846 units per square kilometre	1,870 units per square kilometre	Denmark
2020s	29,435 units per square kilometre	34,039 units per square kilometre	4,604 units per square kilometre	Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Denmark or Israel?: Israel, at 32,110 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Denmark and Israel?: 1,461 units per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Israel?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Israel rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Denmark ranks 14th and Israel ranks 13th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Israel: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/israel/">Denmark vs Israel: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.