Denmark vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Denmark
30,649 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Korea
33,601 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
14th
Republic of Korea rank
12th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Republic of Korea
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 33,601 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 2,952 units per square kilometre.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 14th and Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 6 and Republic of Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 1,129 units per square kilometre 24.7 units per square kilometre 1,105 units per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 2,037 units per square kilometre 105.85 units per square kilometre 1,931 units per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 5,020 units per square kilometre 302.49 units per square kilometre 4,717 units per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 14,487 units per square kilometre 4,498 units per square kilometre 9,989 units per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 14,506 units per square kilometre 5,390 units per square kilometre 9,116 units per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 22,715 units per square kilometre 20,527 units per square kilometre 2,188 units per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 29,435 units per square kilometre 35,310 units per square kilometre 5,875 units per square kilometre Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Denmark or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 33,601 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Denmark and Republic of Korea?
2,952 units per square kilometre, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Republic of Korea rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 14th and Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/korea-rep/">Denmark vs Republic of Korea: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.