Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Denmark
30,649 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
34,309 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
14th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
11th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 34,309 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 3,660 units per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 14th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 1,129 units per square kilometre 201.43 units per square kilometre 928.01 units per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 2,037 units per square kilometre 3,955 units per square kilometre 1,917 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 5,020 units per square kilometre 16,235 units per square kilometre 11,215 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 14,487 units per square kilometre 3.33 units per square kilometre 14,484 units per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 14,506 units per square kilometre 15,857 units per square kilometre 1,351 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 22,715 units per square kilometre 27,942 units per square kilometre 5,227 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 29,435 units per square kilometre 33,598 units per square kilometre 4,163 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Denmark or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 34,309 units per square kilometre against 30,649 units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago?
3,660 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 14th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/trinidad-and-tobago/">Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.