Equatorial Guinea vs Türkiye: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
236.18 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye
196.8 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
117th
Türkiye rank
120th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Türkiye
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 236.18 units per square kilometre against 196.8 units per square kilometre in Türkiye, a difference of 39.38 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Türkiye ranks 120th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Türkiye in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 1.98 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 1.98 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 15.74 units per square kilometre 15.89 units per square kilometre 0.1513 units per square kilometre Türkiye
1980s 2.96 units per square kilometre 35.34 units per square kilometre 32.38 units per square kilometre Türkiye
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 73.55 units per square kilometre 73.55 units per square kilometre Türkiye
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 213.64 units per square kilometre 213.64 units per square kilometre Türkiye
2010s 228.12 units per square kilometre 212.89 units per square kilometre 15.23 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 242.59 units per square kilometre 201.98 units per square kilometre 40.61 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Türkiye?
Equatorial Guinea, at 236.18 units per square kilometre against 196.8 units per square kilometre in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Türkiye?
39.38 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Türkiye?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Türkiye rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Türkiye ranks 120th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Türkiye: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/turkiye/">Equatorial Guinea vs Türkiye: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.