How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Georgia vs Namibia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Georgia

0.4207 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.2439 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Georgia rank

163rd

Namibia rank

165th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Georgia
Namibia

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.4207 units per square kilometre against 0.2439 units per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.1768 units per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.7 times Namibia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 165th of 189 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Georgia	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.2026 units per square kilometre	0.0378 units per square kilometre	0.1648 units per square kilometre	Georgia
2000s	0.2098 units per square kilometre	0.1099 units per square kilometre	0.1 units per square kilometre	Georgia
2010s	0.2803 units per square kilometre	0.1593 units per square kilometre	0.121 units per square kilometre	Georgia
2020s	0.4321 units per square kilometre	0.2506 units per square kilometre	0.1815 units per square kilometre	Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Georgia or Namibia?: Georgia, at 0.4207 units per square kilometre against 0.2439 units per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Georgia and Namibia?: 0.1768 units per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Georgia ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 165th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Namibia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/georgia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/georgia/namibia/">Georgia vs Namibia: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.