Guatemala vs South Africa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Guatemala
684.77 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
722.36 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
86th
South Africa rank
85th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • South Africa
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 722.36 units per square kilometre against 684.77 units per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 37.59 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 86th and South Africa ranks 85th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 7.8 units per square kilometre 43.36 units per square kilometre 35.56 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 102.48 units per square kilometre 34.79 units per square kilometre 67.69 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 42.62 units per square kilometre 35.48 units per square kilometre 7.14 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0.081 units per square kilometre 0.081 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0.9631 units per square kilometre 0.9631 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 282.5 units per square kilometre 306.07 units per square kilometre 23.57 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 703.36 units per square kilometre 748.89 units per square kilometre 45.53 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Guatemala or South Africa?
South Africa, at 722.36 units per square kilometre against 684.77 units per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Guatemala and South Africa?
37.59 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and South Africa rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 86th and South Africa ranks 85th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs South Africa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/">Guatemala vs South Africa: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.