How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uruguay?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iraq vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Iraq

896.08 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

940.25 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Iraq rank

81st

Uruguay rank

78th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Iraq
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 940.25 units per square kilometre against 896.08 units per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 44.17 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Iraq ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iraq	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1960s	23.14 units per square kilometre	6.37 units per square kilometre	16.77 units per square kilometre	Iraq
1970s	64.25 units per square kilometre	24.64 units per square kilometre	39.61 units per square kilometre	Iraq
1980s	90.64 units per square kilometre	43.75 units per square kilometre	46.89 units per square kilometre	Iraq
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	114.86 units per square kilometre	114.86 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
2000s	359.35 units per square kilometre	52.17 units per square kilometre	307.18 units per square kilometre	Iraq
2010s	724.26 units per square kilometre	748.4 units per square kilometre	24.14 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
2020s	920.41 units per square kilometre	919.38 units per square kilometre	1.03 units per square kilometre	Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Iraq or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 940.25 units per square kilometre against 896.08 units per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Iraq and Uruguay?: 44.17 units per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uruguay?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Uruguay rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Iraq ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uruguay/">Iraq vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.