How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and World?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs World: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Malta

187,225 units per square kilometre

in 2023

World

1,198 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta rank

3rd

World rank

1st

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Malta
World

How they compare

Malta currently reports 187,225 units per square kilometre against 1,198 units per square kilometre in World, a difference of 186,027 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 156.2 times World's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was World ahead.

Malta ranks 3rd and World ranks 1st of 189 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	World	Difference	Ahead
1960s	1,740 units per square kilometre	49.81 units per square kilometre	1,690 units per square kilometre	Malta
1970s	30,369 units per square kilometre	126.57 units per square kilometre	30,242 units per square kilometre	Malta
1980s	100,211 units per square kilometre	343.52 units per square kilometre	99,867 units per square kilometre	Malta
1990s	122,315 units per square kilometre	439.12 units per square kilometre	121,876 units per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	179,945 units per square kilometre	470.77 units per square kilometre	179,475 units per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	169,624 units per square kilometre	920.72 units per square kilometre	168,703 units per square kilometre	Malta
2020s	183,433 units per square kilometre	1,255 units per square kilometre	182,179 units per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Malta or World?: Malta, at 187,225 units per square kilometre against 1,198 units per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Malta and World?: 186,027 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and World?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and World rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Malta ranks 3rd and World ranks 1st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs World: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/malta/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/malta/world/">Malta vs World: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.