Norway vs United States of America: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Norway
3,919 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
3,312 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
44th
United States of America rank
47th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • United States of America
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 3,919 units per square kilometre against 3,312 units per square kilometre in United States of America, a difference of 607 units per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Norway ranks 44th and United States of America ranks 47th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 6 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 114.85 units per square kilometre 115.52 units per square kilometre 0.6678 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 449.18 units per square kilometre 211.06 units per square kilometre 238.12 units per square kilometre Norway
1980s 1,276 units per square kilometre 1,004 units per square kilometre 272.8 units per square kilometre Norway
1990s 2,189 units per square kilometre 1,576 units per square kilometre 612.81 units per square kilometre Norway
2000s 1,583 units per square kilometre 1,454 units per square kilometre 129.72 units per square kilometre Norway
2010s 2,873 units per square kilometre 2,563 units per square kilometre 309.65 units per square kilometre Norway
2020s 4,020 units per square kilometre 3,757 units per square kilometre 262.7 units per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Norway or United States of America?
Norway, at 3,919 units per square kilometre against 3,312 units per square kilometre in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Norway and United States of America?
607 units per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and United States of America rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 44th and United States of America ranks 47th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs United States of America: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/norway/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/norway/united-states/">Norway vs United States of America: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.