How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Uruguay?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Panama vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Panama

984.09 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

940.25 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Panama rank

77th

Uruguay rank

78th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

Panama
Uruguay

How they compare

Panama currently reports 984.09 units per square kilometre against 940.25 units per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 43.84 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Panama ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Panama	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1960s	1.36 units per square kilometre	6.37 units per square kilometre	5.01 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
1970s	43.25 units per square kilometre	24.64 units per square kilometre	18.61 units per square kilometre	Panama
1980s	26.2 units per square kilometre	43.75 units per square kilometre	17.55 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
1990s	179.72 units per square kilometre	114.86 units per square kilometre	64.86 units per square kilometre	Panama
2000s	232.6 units per square kilometre	52.17 units per square kilometre	180.43 units per square kilometre	Panama
2010s	550.17 units per square kilometre	748.4 units per square kilometre	198.23 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
2020s	1,011 units per square kilometre	919.38 units per square kilometre	91.43 units per square kilometre	Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Panama or Uruguay?: Panama, at 984.09 units per square kilometre against 940.25 units per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Panama and Uruguay?: 43.84 units per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Uruguay?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Uruguay rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?: Panama ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/panama/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/panama/uruguay/">Panama vs Uruguay: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.