Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Portugal
6,829 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
5,069 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
35th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
38th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Portugal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 6,829 units per square kilometre against 5,069 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1,760 units per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.3 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Portugal ranks 35th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 38th of 189 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 164.04 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 164.04 units per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 167.77 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 167.77 units per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 536.3 units per square kilometre 10.23 units per square kilometre 526.07 units per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 4,079 units per square kilometre 102.84 units per square kilometre 3,976 units per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 3,255 units per square kilometre 461.46 units per square kilometre 2,794 units per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 5,273 units per square kilometre 2,378 units per square kilometre 2,895 units per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 7,015 units per square kilometre 5,206 units per square kilometre 1,808 units per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Portugal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Portugal, at 6,829 units per square kilometre against 5,069 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
1,760 units per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 35th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 38th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.