San Marino vs Sao Tome and Principe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

San Marino
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0014 units per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino rank
180th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0014 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0.0014 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

San Marino ranks 180th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 109.17 units per square kilometre 109.17 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 312.02 units per square kilometre 312.02 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 42,756 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 42,756 units per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 99,664 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre 99,664 units per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 190,425 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre 190,425 units per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, San Marino or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0014 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between San Marino and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0014 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do San Marino and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
San Marino ranks 180th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

San Marino vs Sao Tome and Principe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/sao-tome-and-principe/">San Marino vs Sao Tome and Principe: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.