Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0014 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0008 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th
Uganda rank
178th

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uganda
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0014 units per square kilometre against 0.0008 units per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0006 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.8 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 178th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 11.7 units per square kilometre 11.7 units per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 109.17 units per square kilometre 7.07 units per square kilometre 102.1 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 312.02 units per square kilometre 9.6 units per square kilometre 302.41 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
2000s 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0014 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Uganda?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0014 units per square kilometre against 0.0008 units per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
0.0006 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda rank globally for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 178th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.