How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Serbia: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre

Chile

647.42 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

557.08 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

83rd

Serbia rank

84th

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Serbia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 647.42 units per square kilometre against 557.08 units per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 90.34 units per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 84th of 189 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	142.03 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	142.03 units per square kilometre	Chile
2010s	257.83 units per square kilometre	213.93 units per square kilometre	43.91 units per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	633.04 units per square kilometre	556.46 units per square kilometre	76.59 units per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre, Chile or Serbia?: Chile, at 647.42 units per square kilometre against 557.08 units per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre between Chile and Serbia?: 90.34 units per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 84th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/chile/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/chile/serbia/">Chile vs Serbia: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.