China vs Rwanda: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre

China
768.65 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
811.95 units per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
74th
Rwanda rank
72nd

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 811.95 units per square kilometre against 768.65 units per square kilometre in China, a difference of 43.3 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 51.11 units per square kilometre 51.11 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 22.28 units per square kilometre 342.08 units per square kilometre 319.8 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 105.09 units per square kilometre 173.82 units per square kilometre 68.74 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 171.19 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 171.19 units per square kilometre China
2010s 270.96 units per square kilometre 324.76 units per square kilometre 53.8 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 779.34 units per square kilometre 811.95 units per square kilometre 32.61 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 811.95 units per square kilometre against 768.65 units per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre between China and Rwanda?
43.3 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre?
China ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.