How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uruguay?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Uruguay: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre

Iceland

692.3 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

700.8 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

80th

Uruguay rank

78th

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre over time

Iceland
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 700.8 units per square kilometre against 692.3 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 8.5 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Iceland ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1960s	21.72 units per square kilometre	6.37 units per square kilometre	15.36 units per square kilometre	Iceland
1970s	22.6 units per square kilometre	18.81 units per square kilometre	3.79 units per square kilometre	Iceland
1980s	46.15 units per square kilometre	36.67 units per square kilometre	9.48 units per square kilometre	Iceland
1990s	99.78 units per square kilometre	81.88 units per square kilometre	17.9 units per square kilometre	Iceland
2000s	185.44 units per square kilometre	40.77 units per square kilometre	144.67 units per square kilometre	Iceland
2010s	389.81 units per square kilometre	514.42 units per square kilometre	124.6 units per square kilometre	Uruguay
2020s	692.3 units per square kilometre	668.51 units per square kilometre	23.79 units per square kilometre	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre, Iceland or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 700.8 units per square kilometre against 692.3 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre between Iceland and Uruguay?: 8.5 units per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uruguay?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Uruguay rank globally for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre?: Iceland ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Uruguay: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uruguay/">Iceland vs Uruguay: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.