Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
115.3 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
90.47 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
132nd
Tanzania rank
135th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Tanzania
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 115.3 units per square kilometre against 90.47 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 24.83 units per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 132nd and Tanzania ranks 135th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.39 units per square kilometre 2.65 units per square kilometre 0.2575 units per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 14.85 units per square kilometre 3.9 units per square kilometre 10.95 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 29.79 units per square kilometre 0.2194 units per square kilometre 29.57 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 37.2 units per square kilometre 12.68 units per square kilometre 24.52 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 39.06 units per square kilometre 16.45 units per square kilometre 22.61 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 71.31 units per square kilometre 47.52 units per square kilometre 23.79 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 117.15 units per square kilometre 92.92 units per square kilometre 24.23 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Tanzania?
Burkina Faso, at 115.3 units per square kilometre against 90.47 units per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
24.83 units per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 132nd and Tanzania ranks 135th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/">Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.