Chile vs Iceland: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Chile
868.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
928.84 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
83rd
Iceland rank
80th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Iceland
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 928.84 units per square kilometre against 868.62 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 60.22 units per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Chile ranks 83rd and Iceland ranks 80th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 21.72 units per square kilometre 21.72 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 13.3 units per square kilometre 26.48 units per square kilometre 13.18 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 31.55 units per square kilometre 55.85 units per square kilometre 24.3 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 185.52 units per square kilometre 140.33 units per square kilometre 45.19 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 402.85 units per square kilometre 270.37 units per square kilometre 132.48 units per square kilometre Chile
2010s 379.76 units per square kilometre 552.67 units per square kilometre 172.91 units per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 871.17 units per square kilometre 954.05 units per square kilometre 82.88 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Chile or Iceland?
Iceland, at 928.84 units per square kilometre against 868.62 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Chile and Iceland?
60.22 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 83rd and Iceland ranks 80th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Iceland: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/">Chile vs Iceland: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.