Congo vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Congo
79.1 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
90.47 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
136th
Tanzania rank
135th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 90.47 units per square kilometre against 79.1 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 11.37 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Congo ranks 136th and Tanzania ranks 135th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.72 units per square kilometre 2.65 units per square kilometre 0.9282 units per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 4.27 units per square kilometre 3.9 units per square kilometre 0.375 units per square kilometre Congo
1980s 3.72 units per square kilometre 0.2194 units per square kilometre 3.5 units per square kilometre Congo
1990s 2.06 units per square kilometre 12.68 units per square kilometre 10.62 units per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 2.34 units per square kilometre 16.45 units per square kilometre 14.11 units per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 26.29 units per square kilometre 47.52 units per square kilometre 21.22 units per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 80.91 units per square kilometre 92.92 units per square kilometre 12.02 units per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Congo or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 90.47 units per square kilometre against 79.1 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Congo and Tanzania?
11.37 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 136th and Tanzania ranks 135th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/">Congo vs Tanzania: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.