South Korea vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

South Korea
33,507 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
29,976 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
12th
United Kingdom rank
15th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • United Kingdom
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 33,507 units per square kilometre against 29,976 units per square kilometre in United Kingdom, a difference of 3,531 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom ahead.

South Korea ranks 12th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 24.7 units per square kilometre 455.53 units per square kilometre 430.84 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
1970s 105.85 units per square kilometre 361.6 units per square kilometre 255.75 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 302.49 units per square kilometre 7,214 units per square kilometre 6,912 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 4,498 units per square kilometre 10,885 units per square kilometre 6,387 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 5,390 units per square kilometre 15,506 units per square kilometre 10,117 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 13,124 units per square kilometre 17,889 units per square kilometre 4,765 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
2020s 34,366 units per square kilometre 28,814 units per square kilometre 5,553 units per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, South Korea or United Kingdom?
South Korea, at 33,507 units per square kilometre against 29,976 units per square kilometre in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between South Korea and United Kingdom?
3,531 units per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and United Kingdom rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 12th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/united-kingdom/">South Korea vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.