Luxembourg vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Luxembourg
184,560 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
95.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
4th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 184,560 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 184,465 units per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1,933.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 34,976 units per square kilometre 7.41 units per square kilometre 34,969 units per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 68,119 units per square kilometre 43.44 units per square kilometre 68,076 units per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 174,876 units per square kilometre 97.58 units per square kilometre 174,778 units per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Luxembourg or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Luxembourg, at 184,560 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Luxembourg and Sub-Saharan Africa?
184,465 units per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sub-Saharan Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Luxembourg ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/sub-saharan-africa/">Luxembourg vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.