Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Malta
187,225 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
95.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 187,225 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 187,130 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1,961.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Malta ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1,740 units per square kilometre 4.64 units per square kilometre 1,735 units per square kilometre Malta
1970s 30,369 units per square kilometre 8.81 units per square kilometre 30,360 units per square kilometre Malta
1980s 100,211 units per square kilometre 10.2 units per square kilometre 100,200 units per square kilometre Malta
1990s 122,315 units per square kilometre 7.91 units per square kilometre 122,307 units per square kilometre Malta
2000s 179,945 units per square kilometre 7.41 units per square kilometre 179,938 units per square kilometre Malta
2010s 140,359 units per square kilometre 43.44 units per square kilometre 140,315 units per square kilometre Malta
2020s 183,433 units per square kilometre 97.58 units per square kilometre 183,336 units per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Malta or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Malta, at 187,225 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa?
187,130 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/malta/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/malta/sub-saharan-africa/">Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.