Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Mauritius
27,874 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
29,976 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
17th
United Kingdom rank
15th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • United Kingdom
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 29,976 units per square kilometre against 27,874 units per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 2,102 units per square kilometre.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Mauritius ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 16.42 units per square kilometre 455.53 units per square kilometre 439.11 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
1970s 1,131 units per square kilometre 361.6 units per square kilometre 769.3 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 12.41 units per square kilometre 7,214 units per square kilometre 7,202 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 4,575 units per square kilometre 10,885 units per square kilometre 6,310 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 10,642 units per square kilometre 15,506 units per square kilometre 4,864 units per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 21,378 units per square kilometre 17,889 units per square kilometre 3,489 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 26,233 units per square kilometre 28,814 units per square kilometre 2,581 units per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Mauritius or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 29,976 units per square kilometre against 27,874 units per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Mauritius and United Kingdom?
2,102 units per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and United Kingdom rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-kingdom/">Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.