Netherlands vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Netherlands
92,050 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
95.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands rank
5th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 92,050 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 91,955 units per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 964.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 8,268 units per square kilometre 4.64 units per square kilometre 8,264 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 15,339 units per square kilometre 8.81 units per square kilometre 15,330 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 21,498 units per square kilometre 10.2 units per square kilometre 21,487 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 47,378 units per square kilometre 7.91 units per square kilometre 47,370 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 52,665 units per square kilometre 7.41 units per square kilometre 52,658 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 45,044 units per square kilometre 43.44 units per square kilometre 45,000 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 89,274 units per square kilometre 97.58 units per square kilometre 89,176 units per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Netherlands or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Netherlands, at 92,050 units per square kilometre against 95.45 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Netherlands and Sub-Saharan Africa?
91,955 units per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Netherlands and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/sub-saharan-africa/">Netherlands vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.