What is the difference in reserves excluding gold (sdr), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?

56.25 SDR per person, with Nepal ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?

43 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita

Equatorial Guinea

436.29 SDR per person

in 2024

Nepal

492.54 SDR per person

in 2025

Equatorial Guinea rank

124th

Nepal rank

123rd

Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita over time

Equatorial Guinea
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 492.54 SDR per person against 436.29 SDR per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 56.25 SDR per person.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Nepal ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 123rd of 179 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1980s	6.13 SDR per person	6.83 SDR per person	0.6929 SDR per person	Nepal
1990s	4.59 SDR per person	18.83 SDR per person	14.24 SDR per person	Nepal
2000s	1,149 SDR per person	42.04 SDR per person	1,107 SDR per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	941.96 SDR per person	161.47 SDR per person	780.49 SDR per person	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	341.36 SDR per person	280.71 SDR per person	60.65 SDR per person	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserves excluding gold (sdr), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Nepal?: Nepal, at 492.54 SDR per person against 436.29 SDR per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in reserves excluding gold (sdr), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?: 56.25 SDR per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?: 43 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nepal rank globally for reserves excluding gold (sdr), per capita?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 123rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserves-excluding-gold-sdr-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserves-excluding-gold-sdr-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/nepal/">Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserves excluding gold (SDR), per capita
Unit: SDR per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,443 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Reserves excluding gold (SDR) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.