China vs Korea: Restricted Deposits (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic)
China
4.80 trillion
in 2024
Korea
2.10 trillion
in 2012
China rank
3rd
Korea rank
4th
Restricted Deposits (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic) over time
- China
- Korea
How they compare
China currently reports 4.80 trillion against 2.10 trillion in Korea, a difference of 2.69 trillion.
That makes China's figure about 2.3 times Korea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Korea ahead.
China ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 4th of 103 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.13 billion | 543.45 billion | 530.32 billion | Korea |
| 1980s | 22.86 billion | 571.02 billion | 548.15 billion | Korea |
| 1990s | 354.45 billion | 872.57 billion | 518.12 billion | Korea |
| 2000s | 685.95 billion | 1.20 trillion | 514.53 billion | Korea |
| 2010s | 542.54 billion | 1.97 trillion | 1.42 trillion | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher restricted deposits, China or Korea?
- China, at 4.80 trillion against 2.10 trillion in Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in restricted deposits between China and Korea?
- 2.69 trillion, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Korea?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2012.
- How do China and Korea rank globally for restricted deposits?
- China ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 4th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Restricted Deposits (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.