Mauritius vs Zambia: Restricted Deposits
Mauritius
195.69 billion
in 2008
Zambia
46.69 billion
in 2008
Mauritius rank
13th
Zambia rank
15th
Restricted Deposits over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 195.69 billion against 46.69 billion in Zambia, a difference of 149.00 billion.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 4.2 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 13th and Zambia ranks 15th of 103 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 5.54 million | 0 | 5.54 million | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 17.01 million | 0 | 17.01 million | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 79.37 billion | 41.09 billion | 38.28 billion | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher restricted deposits, Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 195.69 billion against 46.69 billion in Zambia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in restricted deposits between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 149.00 billion, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2008.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for restricted deposits?
- Mauritius ranks 13th and Zambia ranks 15th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Restricted Deposits (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.