Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Risk premium on lending
Risk premium on lending over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9% | 1.3% | 2.5% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 1.4% | 1.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk premium on lending, Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 2.2% against 2.2% in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in risk premium on lending between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for risk premium on lending?
- Namibia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Risk premium on lending (lending rate minus treasury bill rate, %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Risk premium on lending is the interest rate charged by banks on loans to private sector customers minus the "risk free" treasury bill interest rate at which short-term government securities are issued or traded in the market. In some countries this spread may be negative, indicating that the market considers its best corporate clients to be lower risk than the government. The terms and conditions attached to lending rates differ by country, however, limiting their comparability.