Bolivia vs Japan: Securities Other Than Shares, Money Market Instruments (Depository)
Bolivia
0
in 2008
Japan
0
in 2008
Bolivia rank
37th
Japan rank
37th
Securities Other Than Shares, Money Market Instruments (Depository) over time
- Bolivia
- Japan
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0 against 0 in Japan, a difference of 0.
Across all 56 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 37th and Japan ranks 37th of 90 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 1.43 trillion | 1.43 trillion | Japan |
| 1970s | 0 | 12.59 trillion | 12.59 trillion | Japan |
| 1980s | 0 | 43.62 trillion | 43.62 trillion | Japan |
| 1990s | 13.89 million | 88.25 trillion | 88.25 trillion | Japan |
| 2000s | 106.53 million | 10.63 trillion | 10.63 trillion | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher securities other than shares, money market instruments, Bolivia or Japan?
- Bolivia, at 0 against 0 in Japan as of 2008.
- What is the difference in securities other than shares, money market instruments between Bolivia and Japan?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Japan?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2008.
- How do Bolivia and Japan rank globally for securities other than shares, money market instruments?
- Bolivia ranks 37th and Japan ranks 37th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Securities Other Than Shares, Money Market Instruments (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.