Canada vs Sweden: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
Canada
128.4
in 2018
Sweden
128.4
in 2018
Canada rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- Canada
- Sweden
How they compare
Canada currently reports 128.4 against 128.4 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 109.47 | 109.47 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), Canada or Sweden?
- Canada, at 128.4 against 128.4 in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between Canada and Sweden?
- 0, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Sweden rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- Canada ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).