Japan vs New Zealand: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
Japan
100
in 2018
New Zealand
100
in 2018
Japan rank
14th
New Zealand rank
14th
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- Japan
- New Zealand
How they compare
Japan currently reports 100 against 100 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), Japan or New Zealand?
- Japan, at 100 against 100 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between Japan and New Zealand?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Japan and New Zealand rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- Japan ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).