Malaysia vs Mexico: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
Malaysia
100
in 2018
Mexico
100
in 2018
Malaysia rank
14th
Mexico rank
14th
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- Malaysia
- Mexico
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100 against 100 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 14th and Mexico ranks 14th of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), Malaysia or Mexico?
- Malaysia, at 100 against 100 in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between Malaysia and Mexico?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Mexico rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- Malaysia ranks 14th and Mexico ranks 14th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).