New Zealand vs Philippines: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
New Zealand
100
in 2018
Philippines
100
in 2018
New Zealand rank
14th
Philippines rank
14th
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 100 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 14th of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 100 in Philippines as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 14th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).