New Zealand vs Serbia: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
New Zealand
100
in 2018
Serbia
100
in 2018
New Zealand rank
14th
Serbia rank
14th
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 100 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 14th of 47 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), New Zealand or Serbia?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 100 in Serbia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 14th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).