Rwanda vs Sweden: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 128.4 against 128.4 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Sweden ahead.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 47 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 118.94 | 109.47 | 9.47 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 128.4 against 128.4 in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).