South Africa vs United Kingdom: Stakeholder Inclusion (C)
Stakeholder Inclusion (C) over time
- South Africa
- United Kingdom
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 128.4 against 128.4 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 47 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 118.94 | 128.4 | 9.47 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stakeholder inclusion (c), South Africa or United Kingdom?
- South Africa, at 128.4 against 128.4 in United Kingdom as of 2018.
- What is the difference in stakeholder inclusion (c) between South Africa and United Kingdom?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United Kingdom?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do South Africa and United Kingdom rank globally for stakeholder inclusion (c)?
- South Africa ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Stakeholder Inclusion (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).