Latvia vs Oman: Stock market total value traded to GDP
Stock market total value traded to GDP over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 1.4% against 1.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Oman ahead.
Latvia ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 59th of 97 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 9.4% | 8.7% | Oman |
| 2000s | 2.2% | 4.2% | 2.0% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stock market total value traded to gdp, Latvia or Oman?
- Oman, at 1.4% against 1.1% in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in stock market total value traded to gdp between Latvia and Oman?
- 0.3%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for stock market total value traded to gdp?
- Latvia ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 59th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Stock Markets Factbook and supplemental S&P data, Standard & Poor's, published as Stock market total value traded to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total value of all traded shares in a stock market exchange as a percentage of GDP. Following deflation method is use: {(0.5)*[Ft/P_et + Ft-1/P_et-1]}/[GDPt/P_at] where F is stock market capitalization, P_e is end-of period CPI, and P_a is average annual CPI. End-of period CPI (IFS line 64M..ZF or, if not available, 64Q..ZF) and average annual CPI is calculated using the monthly CPI values (IFS line 64M..ZF).