Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Stocks traded, total value
Stocks traded, total value over time
- Belgium
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 22.8% against 19.9% in Belgium, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 29th of 104 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.0% | 10.9% | 1.1% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 16.0% | 13.2% | 2.8% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stocks traded, total value, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 22.8% against 19.9% in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in stocks traded, total value between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 2.9%, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2001.
- How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for stocks traded, total value?
- Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 29th of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Federation of Exchanges database, World Federation of Exchanges (WFE), published as Stocks traded, total value (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The value of shares traded is the total number of shares traded, both domestic and foreign, multiplied by their respective matching prices. Figures are single counted (only one side of the transaction is considered). Companies admitted to listing and admitted to trading are included in the data. Data are end of year values.